Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus MST. RASHIDA KHANUM

For the specific performance of the Article 12 sale agreement, the plaintiff claimed that the defendants had contracted to sell the land in his favor and that the defendants had refused to enforce the contract because on the record according to the plaintiff's receipt. The husband of one of the plaintiffs was signed and the brother of the other, but was not executed in his capacity as the alleged sale agreement was not proved by the evidence on the record, but only A canal has been contracted. The 4 Kanal and 16 Marla which the Defendants in their written statement considered as the plaintiff were entitled to the specific performance of the contract in respect of only one Canal, only the Declaration passed in favor of the Plaintiff for consideration. The Plaintiff's case was with the trial court that the balance amount would be refunded, which was submitted by the plaintiff under the decree passed by the trial. The court in his favor law firms from Madinah lawyer