DR. SHABIR KAYANI versus DR. SYED MUSHTAQ AHMAD GARDAZI
Appointment of RR 10 B & 13 on the basis of the present charge The appointment of nature on the basis of the present charge was not a development as the appointment is based on the existing charge and this advertisement is subject to the R10 B of the Government employees of Azad Jammu and Kashmir in each case. I was clearly different (Appointment and Terms and Conditions) Rule 1977, there was no order of promotion and pay scale which was not mentioned in the above rule, the appointment based on the current charge was at the highest level of R 10 B. There was no high-level appointment, temporary arrangement in which a person would be appointed on a permanent basis or on the expiry of six months. Regular appointment was a step that was to be made after the appointment on the basis of the current charge and the two were not on the same appointment was promotion on the basis of appointment, but on the basis of current charge the appointment was not progress.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer