Find a Lawyer

MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI versus SARDAR RAFIQUE MEHMOOD KHAN

Section (()) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 19744), the appointment of the Chairman of the Section 43 and Service 43 Service Tribunal respondent, who was a prominent advocate by profession, as the Chairman Service Tribunal. The appointment was challenged on the ground that the appellant, at the time of his appointment, had crossed the age of 62 that only such person was appointed as the chairman service under section 3 (3) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975. The tribunal could be appointed who was qualified or qualified to be a judge. The High Court and only such person may be appointed as a High Court Judge who is under 62 years and under section 43 (5) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974, no person shall be held under this post. Can The provisions of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, even though a person above the age of 62 could not remain as a High Court Judge, could be a Standing Judge or even a retired Judge. May be appointed as a tribunal, which means that a person above the age of 62 can hold the post of chairman service tribunal if he is otherwise eligible to be a High Court Judge and 62 years of age. If you cross the age, you can. Nevertheless, the appellant's service should be designated as the chairman of the tribunal that a retired judge of the High Court may be requested to sit and act as the chairman of the service tribunal, but a person who has served the High Court It cannot be allowed to act as the judge's requirement. The Chairman Service Tribunal, since he was 62 years old, was rejected when his famous supreme court advocate from Mir Ali lawyer