ABDUL RAHEEM ZUBAIR BUTT versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Sections 2 (A), 3 and 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 (12) of the Code of Conduct of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court, 1984, Judicial Officer Corruption of Chip XVIII, employed by the Chief. As the removal authority charged, the Prime Minister accepted the petitioner's representation and ordered the removal from service, the High Court judges refused to comply with the Prime Minister's order and accepted the officer's participation report. Refused, and informed them of their decision to meet. He was not eligible to be represented before the Prime Minister. The decision taken by the High Court Judges at the meeting of the Administration was satisfactory and in such a case or judicial proceeding, such order did not fall within the purview of the judicial order. The decisions of section 42 (12) of the Constitution / the orders of the judges of the High Court which passed in their meetings were the executive and administrative business of the court. The order passed by the High Court Procedure Rules, Chip XVIII of 1984, for the appointment of the employee of the court, did not come under section 9 of the Act (Special Powers) Act, 2001, which was removed from Azad Jammu and Kashmir. An appeal will be heard before the court. Determination of removal of applicant from employment or confirmation of Prime Minister's Supreme Court order through the Forum
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
