Find a Lawyer

ABBAS versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 449/149 evidence was appreciated when the complainant's house was located, the most natural of the three witnesses presented by the prosecution who were the accused and the close relative of the complainant. The witnesses in whose case the police immediately named the weapons with which they were armed and the role they played were largely mentioned in the FIR site plan. There was an electric bulb in the place and the sides were so closely related to each other that six people were killed. In this case and all of them were very closely related and two of them were sons of the deceased, there was no dispute between the ocular account and medical evidence, the number of suspects also the number of casualties recovered and the empty cartridges. Weapons were used from the suspect, but the firearms specialist was not sent for dual purposes for comparison. There is no possibility of lying to the three accused; there is no possibility of making any false allegations of the three accused in this case; they were properly punished and their appeals to the extent that the three accused were fully proved in the case. Was excluded and answered in reference to the murder against them. He has no role in being named in the fourth trial accused in the FIR or before, saying that the accused was found innocent not only by the local police, but also by the crime branch, but a case against the accused was found. No, his appeal was accepted and ordered to be released attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jamshoro lawyer