Find a Lawyer

CH. NISAR ALI KHAN versus GHULAM SARWAR KHAN

Public Representation Act (LXXXVS 1976), Sections 14 (5), (5A) and 99 (1) (CC) Representation of the public (holding elections) Rules 1977, RRR 2002 General Conducting Elections Order 7. 4 A & 4 B nomination papers, objection to the Appellant's request mode was that the respondent had obtained a bachelor's degree on the basis of a fake FA Certificate Returning Officer; the accuracy of the Returning Officer was to accept the nomination papers. ? Even if the defendant owns a bachelor's degree under Rule 8A of Section 8A of the General Election Order, the bachelor's degree was still in favor of the respondents in 2002, the Vice-Chancellor of the University has yet to declare such a Degree College invalid I did not respond to the appellant's letter. The record shows the difference of the parents of the defendant, the search without detailed examination, the recording of evidence, the hearing of other examiners, the examination of the FA certificate presented by the defendant in front of the Univer. Search will have twice the penalty results. That is, if the respondent is allowed to contest the election and if he is ineligible for the criminal offense and if he succeeds, the appellant will still have a cure to challenge the election through the election petition and the then vice chancellor The university would have passed some order on the letter of the appellant, and the Election Tribunal would have been in a better position to record the evidence and pass the appropriate order. If the present appeal is allowed, it would expel the respondents from the constituency. Will be irreparable harm to the wisdom of summary inquiry Public Representation Act, 1976 Of when you need a advocate from Jhudo lawyer