Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ ULLAH versus THE STATE

Control of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997 Definition of Evidence Section 9 (c) Evidence of prosecution was solid and consistent; four witnesses testified against each other in connection with the recovery of marijuana in which the accused against the police personnel lied. The indictment failed to disclose the allegations. The chemical examiner's report on the substance of the marijuana substance recovered was not disputed by the accused marijuana, which was confessed to the vehicle driven by the accused, which heard the trial court's findings of a legal weakness. And the accused were sentenced. In connection with the custody of the vehicle maintained in the circumstances, the order recovered a 3kg charge from the accused's vehicle, for which he was sentenced to three years imprisonment \ RI with a fine of Rs 10,000. There was no order to discriminate under the circumstances and accordingly it was set aside famous supreme court advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer