Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

Section 2 of the Pakistan Administration for Vacant Property Act (XII of 1957), sections 22 and 41 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 where the property was treated as vacant property and even by mistake, And the non-vacant owners did not cure them under the law at the relevant time, they lost their lien on such property and after the cancellation of the eviction / settlement laws, their right of ownership was proved before the Civil Court. Could not Lack of jurisdiction when the transfer of such property could not be invaded, the same principle had no jurisdiction over the same principle. Under the declaration, the transfer of the property should be canceled because the work that cannot be done directly cannot be done. Was. The indirect transfer of such property was obtained on the basis of PTD, which was issued to them, which could not, in any case, be declared invalid by the civil court, were entitled to declare their title to e-property and others. Cancellation of said property sale in favor of individuals and the assets in the Revenue Record, which consider the title of their property. best advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer