SYED NASIR ABBAS NAQVI versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELATE TRIBUNAL
Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), section 1 (4) (a), 2 (b) and section Oz 12 (3), 15 (4) (5). The application was dismissed on the basis of a complaint filed against the dismissal of the employees of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 application of the Establishment Order, 1968, which was dismissed on the basis of the application. I was working as an Employee Officer Grade III. There was an independent establishment as the number of workers, it was said that the branch is less than 20 workers, the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 did not apply to the issue of employees, various branches of employer bank, The places where they were located were of a commercial nature and would not be treated as separate establishments. There were about 900 branches of the Employer Bank in Pakistan, in which case, it would be unusual. Under the Western Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance, the corporate body is separated from the corporation or any branch except an independent establishment. Understand, the 1968 banking company or a bank was a commercial establishment, regardless of its location or power. Particularly, employees at the branch would be discriminated against if they employed less than 20 people, then the branch of the banking company was employed by the Bank of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders), Ordnance, 1968 branch. , It will not be covered under. Working, under the circumstances, it was not a separate establishment. West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders)
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kot Addu lawyer