AHMAD KHAN versus THE STATE
Section Penal Penal Convictions (AL60 V of 1860), Section 302, Temporary Resilience did not challenge the validity of the document available on record before the trial and the Medical Board order sought to determine the age of the accused. Prayed through The Juvenile Court, under which the petitioner's application was dismissed, did not challenge the authenticity and validity of the accused applicant's school leaving certificate, neither before the trial court nor the Sessions Court / Judicial Court. Before the High Court order. It does not appear to be perverse, hypothetical or against any provision of the law; the High Court refused to interfere with an unknown order exercising the jurisdiction of the review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Zahir Pir lawyer
