Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AHMAD KHAN versus THE STATE


Section Penal Penal Convictions (AL60 V of 1860), Section 302, Temporary Resilience did not challenge the validity of the document available on record before the trial and the Medical Board order sought to determine the age of the accused. Prayed through The Juvenile Court, under which the petitioner's application was dismissed, did not challenge the authenticity and validity of the accused applicant's school leaving certificate, neither before the trial court nor the Sessions Court / Judicial Court. Before the High Court order. It does not appear to be perverse, hypothetical or against any provision of the law; the High Court refused to interfere with an unknown order exercising the jurisdiction of the review.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Jatoi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.