GHULAM RASOOL versus THE JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.III, MULTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Interim order to uphold the constitutional application was filed in the execution of the order passed by the Banking Court Objections The complainant complained that he had neither borrowed from the bank nor was he guaranteed Owned and owned property. There is no mortgage with the bank, therefore, its property cannot be linked to the execution of the decree. The interim injunction against the enforcement of the court was approved by the trial court; the applicant was required to deposit the surplus money through a security request. The provisional order could not impose a condition for immunity. In the initial stage, the grant of a temporary injunction was present before the court of execution and the court was ordered to pass a conditional order for deposit of surplus money through security. Go In strange circumstances, the imposing court imposed its jurisdiction by granting relief under Art 199 of the Constitution, at the discretion the High Court had refused to interfere with the condition imposed by the execution court. The request was removed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Darya Khan lawyer