Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus THE STATE


Section 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34, the trial court's determination preferred to rely on the medical board's opinion of the trial court's reliance on birth registration and school leaving certificate, as requested. The petitioner filed a review before the High Court if the trial court had met the requirements of section 7 of the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000 by inviting the opinion of the Medical Board, the trial court's record of the trial Was in accordance with the law and the facts. Even after inviting inquiries and such opinion, the court was fully authorized to believe or not accept medical evidence and to deny or deny any other document but these findings were based on accepted principles of evidence appreciation. Should be. The trial court called for no interference, as it did not face any kind of unlawful interference or disorder.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.