PUNJAB PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE BANK, LAHORE versus FAZAL-UR-REHMAN
Contract Act 1872 Section 73 and 74 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O VII, R 2 Breach F Contract Token The suit for the collection of money that the plaintiff was interested in buying the land of the plaintiff bid the highest and token money. The plaintiff, who did not agree with the Defendants' Bank sub-committee considerations and payment terms and conditions, did not execute the agreement and the notified bank and its claim that the bank should pay the plaintiff's bank Denies a refund of the token paid from, the defendant filed a lawsuit for his recovery on which the trial court's bankruptcy court Claimed to have approved the payment schedule for the consideration, but failed to submit a contract record of approval of the plaintiff's payment schedule that failed to submit payment of the terms and conditions by the plaintiff. Any documentary evidence of the approval of the schedule failed to prove that the plaintiff was guilty of a breach of the terms and conditions of the contract on the basis that the amount collected by the plaintiff could be confiscated, in which case the trial court Has rightfully rejected the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff to recover the token money submitted by the defendant. Yes.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
