UNITED BANK LIMITED versus TANVIR KHALID
Section 9 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O III, Rr 1 and 2 of the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997, filed this bank with their Branch Manager Banking Court The decision to dismiss the leave application was made on the charge of not being sued by the competent person for recovery. The bank's connection was that it was filed by the Branch Manager, who was presented by the competent authority during the arguments to the Power of Attorney, but the Banking Court refused to accept the same. Section 9 of the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997 revealed that the Branch Manager was eligible to file a case against the Plaintiff Bank, which was filed by the Plaintiff's Branch Manager, The plaintiff was signed. Not in accordance with the law, the High Court accepted the appeal, set aside the judgment and the decree, which would result in the pending adjournment of the case, which would be in accordance with the law for leave to defend. The Banking Court decided
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near FR Peshawar lawyer