MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 265C (1) (c) Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 3 and 71 witnesses present in section 265C (1) (c), limited message to CR PC Not used to give. This means that the period covered in this section covers all the witnesses that fall into the Articles 3 and 71, the law examining all persons who, during the investigation, the 1984 Investigation Officer, The information given to them, or in any other way, appears to be familiar with the circumstances of the case and if the examination of such persons reveals that they had direct or indirect knowledge of the fact about which they were examined. If being done, they will be considered witnesses because their testimony is a Tetra person, therefore, all persons who are aware of the circumstances of the case are included. Including all those who were examined and were not aware of the circumstances of the cage, that is, their testimony is not operational so that they will be called witnesses only after they are aware of the circumstances of the case. The only persons whose testimony runs are those who will be considered witnesses, not the prosecutor seeking evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chunian lawyer