CH. ABDUL MAJEED versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (GENERAL), SHEIKHUPURA
Evacuation Property and Displaced Laws (repealed) Act 1975 Section 2 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) AXXVI, R10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Allocation of vacant property allotted property Reducing the scope of the petitioner's failure to decide on the objections raised by the local commission dispute on the report filed by the local commission dispute was about reducing the amount of property allotted to the applicant. The notification officer relied on the request of the applicants. The orders passed by the Settlement Authorities show that the applicant applied for the entire property and the question transfer order issued to the applicant shows that the property transferred is complete and the transfer order Was enforced and approved by the Revenue Record. No one was challenged in favor of the applicant and the allotment was not even disputed by the department itself in which the quantum of the price fixed and paid by the applicant Was supported - the property was completely and entirely transferred to the applicant claiming that the notified officer mistakenly relied on the report of the local commission because there were objections. The report was filed against and without any objection to the decision, the notified officer reduced the amount of property given to the applicant. Detecting the accuracy of a notified officer was contrary and was not supported. The local commission that was neither endorsed nor valid because this report
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer