KARIM DAD KHAN versus RAMZAN ALIAS JAN MUHAMMAD
The Land Evidence (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, along with the cancellation of section 10/11 land and the documentary evidence on record, showed that the land was allotted after the units of the deceased mother were attached and the respondent / The allottee was transferred to someone who was allotted land. On the notice of double allotment in the name of the respondent at various places, the allotment of land in his name was canceled by the respondent, a suit filed against him by the cancellation of the allotment by the trial court and the appellate court simultaneously ruled. And the earth was harmonized with the respondents. The decisions of the courts below which the underground land was restored to the respondents as a result of the misrepresentation of the evidence on record could not be sustained and the concurrence decisions and orders approved by the following courts were amended by the High Court. Subject to jurisdiction and litigation. Defendant dismissed against petitioner
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Talagang lawyer
