Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus RAVI ENTERPRISES

Financial Institutions (Recovery of Taxes) Ordinances, Sections 9, 10 and 22 of the 2001 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and XXXX, R1 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), for the renewal of sections 42 and 55 suit accounts, declaration The plaintiff filed a petition for damages and injunction, while the petition for leave to defend the case filed by the bank was pending on the plaintiff, the bank was directed to provide its title document, the law Upon receipt of the leave application. The same decision was made in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001; the leave application was not decided after a period of six months, and it has long been a trend. Due to this, no valid justification was found on the record. Before deciding to apply for a grant of interim relief, the banking court should have decided to apply for leave to defend the suit and then proceeded to adjudicate the case, including miscellaneous petitions. In addition to the factories, slipshods and reasons, remand for the case is also needed. First decide to apply for leave to defend the case and then decide to apply for a temporary injunction Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer