Find a Lawyer

AZHAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 A / 114, 302 (b) / 34 & 201 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) / 6 (2) (a) and 7 (b) The defendant allegedly committed an extra-judicial confession or had no authority or influence to assist the accused in any way before the complaining party or the police, before they committed the extra-judicial confession. Was informed and then informed about the police and the complaining party after several days when they met with the above mentioned persons, the conduct of the witnesses in this regard had reduced their apparent value and The prosecution's evidence on the apex court's admission was not valid. No written documents of any credibility were found in the specimens and subsequent documents, even if the piece of evidence was not placed before the accused during his statement. Section 342, CRPC, did not consider that the recovery of the accused from the trial had virtually no consequence as it did not in any way link the commission of the crime. Nor is there any valuable evidence to prove that after smelling the body of the deceased, the smuggling dogs were entangled in the ranks of the agitators, not based on specific facts, especially when the role of the dogs. The witness who testified about the failure to identify the accused in court Medical evidence by the dogs mentioned in his nature and character According to which they could not identify the accused in the case of a disappearance and all other evidence of the prosecution in this case jobs for fresh advocates from Kakul lawyer