Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN versus MALIK MUHAMMAD YOUSUF

Section 30 and 31 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act of 1991 were filed after the prescribed time limit of pre-arrest registered sale deadline suit was the plaintiff's plea that he Can't get knowledge The trial court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the sale due to the failure of the public to issue a notice in accordance with the provisions of section 31 of the Punjab Premises Act 1993. The time fixed for filing a case under the law was four months and the date of its commencement was, in the present case, the date of registration of the deed before the sale, before which the provisions of section 31 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991 Was put into term, because under that term Section 31 of the Act was not used, nor did any other provision of the Act provide any consequence for non-compliance with such clauses that the present No concealment or even concealment can be made by the shopkeeper and seller in this case as the operation was a success through public location. It is referred to by the public place and copies of the sale of the dead can usually be obtained by any member on payment of compensation, which had no connection with section 31 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act 1991 Section 31 of this Act was made non-compliant or non-compliant. Cannot be served by its registrar as the basis for extension of the limit set by section 30 of the Act famous supreme court advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer