Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD NASIR versus MAHMOOD SHAUKAT BHATTI

Representing the People Act 1976, Sections 14 (5) and 99 (1) (CC) of Conan e Martyr (10 of 1984), Article 164 nomination a competing candidate, approval of nomination papers, approval of the nomination papers of the defendant What was the challenge The Bachelor's Degree Respondents in their required nomination papers to demonstrate their lack of qualification required, as a Bachelor of Business Administration, from the court-appointed foreign institution commission, confirming the defendant's foreign degree. For, the Registrar stated that the effect of the response received from the Registrar of Institutions and Foreign Institutions through foreign fax or the Internet was that the respondents were enrolled for only one semester, but any degree or degree from the said institution Diploma was not given , But was rejected in view of the fact that under Article 164 of the Evidence Act, 1 984, the court may permit and use any evidence that was available through modern equipment or techniques. Being a sophisticated computer technology, she was resident under Article 164 of the Act, which was acquired by the competent authority of the relevant foreign company. This was especially considered when it was further confirmed by a commission appointed by the High Court respondents, a Bachelor of Business Administration degree was never obtained and the degree presented to the Returning Officer was a fake document. The respondent was not eligible to contest the election because he lacked a Bachelor's degree under Section 99 (1) (CC) of the Basic Educational Qualification, Representation People Act, 1976 top civil advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer