Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus KISSAN DOST (PVT.) LIMITED

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 4 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Sections 12 and 36 of the Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O. XXXVII, R2. Canceled but in the same accepted trial case, his signatures ordered the plaintiff to dismiss the case in favor of the plaintiff raised by the defendant that the controversial stamps under section 12 of the Stamp Act, 1899 were canceled. Were not disposed of, so it was an unacceptable document in evidence. Stamps affixed to the contradiction were either canceled by drawing a line or the defendant's Through the signatures, therefore, the petition raised by the defendant had no power, as the defendant at the time had admitted in evidence without objection. The Appeal Stamp Act, 1899, could not be ignored at the time of the decision, it was a tax collecting law and the purpose of canceling a stamp was so that it could not be used on any other document, therefore, the law The purpose of the provisions was not to deny the personal rights of the parties, the suit was rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff on the right of the plaintiff and the High Court. Refused to interfere with the trial court's ruling and ruling immigration advocates phone number from Nilore lawyer