Find a Lawyer

ALI AHMAD versus MUSNHI

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Act was the case for the specific performance of the contract to sell the plaintiff's application for Articles (10 of 1984), Article 163 of the Oaths Act (X of 1873), Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11. The defendant denied this claim on 22 22 1994 under Article 163 of the Convention of Martyrdom 1984, in this case applying only for the plaintiff's statement in support of plaintiff's advice. The statement regarding the effect that if the defendants had sworn an oath to the Quran then dismissed the case then the case of the accused's personal appearance was adjourned in 289 1994, but he Did not appear and a copy of the request was delivered to his lawyer. 3 10 In 1994, stating that he did not want to take the oath and subsequently in a joint statement on the Quran, he prayed for a decision on the merits case for refusing to deal with the appeal to the defendants. Subsequently, the trial court gave the impression that the plaintiff's lawyer's legal justification statement was a matter of special oath under the repealed Act, 1873, which is included in the plaintiff's lawyer's statement, contradicting the application. In addition, the complaint filed by the plaintiff expired on 22 9 1994 and hence, on 28-9 1994, the copy of the petition was delivered to the defendant on 5 10 1994, which stated his case on the oath. The defendant (Principal Seller) along with the (lawyer) had received the twenty sums from him and such statements had to be placed before the defendants and they were informed about the oath of the Qur'an. Had to demand that what had not happened, the trial court made no attempt to consider whether ask a advocate free from Pindi gheb lawyer