GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD KHALID CHAUDHRY
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), for the specific performance of the contract to sell to the trial court, the Section 55 suit ruled that the matter was barred by the defendants because of the timely agreement. Was the essence of In addition to the written statement, sell in their evidence, the defendant received a portion of the lost money after the date of the target in the contract, thus bringing the matter to the point that the contract was not at that time because the parties The deal was not set to hit the due date. The contract was to bring the recorded material to display at that time as the essence of the contract. The High Court dismissed the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Quaidabad lawyer
