Find a Lawyer

NADIR ALI versus MST. BEGUM BIBI

Section 8 and 14 of the Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 were the gift of property by the tenant of the occupied property of the deceased suitor who became unconscious and after his death, the Revenue Authorities approved in favor of his sister's sister during the occupation. The defendants and the defendants, with the help of fraudulent and fraudulent transactions of the suit land, claimed the defendants that the occupied tenant's sister had submitted compensation under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, The defendants received it. Defendants' rights were legal The trial court found the tenant's sister in possession when the case was tried in favor of the limited owner and the plaintiff, the first appellate court rejected the trial court's findings, allowed the appeal, and granted the judgment and decision. Passed through the trial and put aside. The Court / Plaintiffs had raised by the Korean / claimants that the provisions of Sections 8 and 114 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, none of the legal heirs misinterpreted and misrepresented by the first appellate court were available and gifts. Was not challenged by the entire holding lien while it was challenged by the proponents of the disputed property, then the rights of the owner / claimant were void. When the transfer of the last tenant was passed in favor of the sister of the deceased occupant tenant under section 114 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, the tenancy of the occupied tenants was imposed and the owner of the disputed property. Challenged the transfer of the tenancy through a civil suit in favor of the sister and then on appeal to her right as a limited owner as of the end of her life. law firms from Kalam lawyer