Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMAD KAHLOON versus RANA MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Section 12, 15 and 49 of the Stamp Act 1899, Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, Rr 1, 2 and 3 suits, for the recovery of money on the basis of absolute adhesive stamp, cancellation of the purpose of cancellation in question. 25 adhesive gestures 2 of these 25 stamps and tickets of each were crossed by line drawing, while generally no risk was afforded in the two stamps adhesive stamps canceled in any effect. The purpose of cancellation of stamps with the duty to write the name or initials of the person acting in addition to the duty may be repealed by section 12 of the Stamp Act, 1899 This was to be avoided if the device was considered to be non-stamp only to the extent of the stamp on which no line was drawn but was canceled. In the present case, 23 out of 25 stamps were permanently canceled. And the provisions of section 12 of the Stamp Act, 1899, would have been substantially compliant with the equipments, which would be regarded as non-stamp only to the extent of stamps, the same cancellation only two stamps were not canceled. These two illegal stamps were sealed to the extent that evidence could be entered into the evidence on payment of fines provided under the law. This question could not contain the sentence that was inadequate. The stamping could form the basis for rejecting the plaintiff's claim Stamp payment was a matter between the citizen and the state, and no opponent could be allowed to benefit from a technicality that would otherwise be in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 Was not fatal. The Stamp Act, 1899 & 35 should not be interpreted in the way that they should be treated as a cruel master lawer from fb area from Piaro goth lawyer