Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/148/149 definition of evidence was the brother of the deceased complainant and both were charged in a case of murder of the accused / appellant's brother and his co-accused. But because of that he was acquitted. In exchange for payment of money as revenge, the parties were compromised and the FIR alleges that the commission of the crime was the sole reason for the enmity between the parties and it appeared that the aforesaid woman was in the hands. A lawsuit was also filed for the dissolution of the marriage and marriage, reliance on the statements of witnesses only when there is a free record of their affirmation, linking their evidence to the commission. The recovery of the pistol itself from the crime could not have provided the free agency, as vacancies were not recovered from the victim's brother-in-law's brother. The FIR was referred to as an eyewitness and the victim's real sister made a statement before the D-Section P / Section DPO that the incident did not take place in the manner described in the FIR, at the site of the incident. The presence of prosecution witnesses was suspected and their statements contradictory In the absence of any proven evidence, it was not safe to rely on the statements of witnesses who were convicted of the death penalty on the same evidence. Which were not relied upon. On conviction of other co-accused who had already been acquitted by the trial court prosecution, but failed to prove the accused without any doubt, the High Court acquitted the accused, giving him the benefit of the doubt. ? law firms from Phagwar lawyer