Sections 17 and 23 were passed in the second case. Appeal of Justice Judiciary Applicant returns the application for compliance with the eviction order in the first case after the landlord's new contract agreeing to pay the monthly rent and the outstanding rent agreement at default intervals. Taken away Meeting the terms of the new agreement, on which the landlord filed for eviction, leading the tenant to decide that the second rent affair was affected by section 23 of the Cantonment Rent Retention Act, 1963. A tenant eviction order was approved for failure to comply. The order of eviction was temporarily withdrawn after the implementation of the new agreement and the status of the matter before it was temporarily canceled with the order of rent and its defense under section 17 (9) of the Defense Act. Was completely different and based on different facts. The default in the payment of rent was not only in relation to the existing rent but also the default basis for arrears arising as a result of non-payment of utility bills and default of default. The final decision could not be made after the decisions, therefore, the times contained in section 23 of this Act did not apply.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
