GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. OF PAK LTD. versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SOCIAL SECURITY COURT
Provision for employees of sections 2 (8) (b), 20, 22, 57, 59 and 64 of the Social Security Ordinance Appellant Company, which was legally registered with the Social Security Institution, respects its protected persons. I was contributing regularly. Under the definition of employee \ 's defined under section 2 (8) (b) of the provincial employees, a default appellant without the Social Security Ordinance, 1965 received a letter from the institution stating that the workers who Wages exceeded 1,500. Per month; Social Security Scheme was not exempt and that they should be paid a contribution and this appellant did not contribute for 519 workers whose wages exceeded Rs 1500 per month and The institute demanded a large sum of money from the appellant in connection with the said workers. Such employees were not eligible to be employed under the Provincial Employees' Social Security Ordinance, 1965, based on the laws of the law, appeal was allowed by the appellant and the orders of the authorities were set aside and against the appellant. The demand was also made, as they too were not included in the law. In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
