Find a Lawyer

MST. MARIUM HAJI versus MRS. YASMIN R. MINHAS

Civil Code 1908 Section 151, O12th, RR1.2 and 4 of the Code, Identification of Produce Exhibit Objects and Procedures Some documents were submitted by the plaintiffs which were not presented as evidence. Nor did the trial court mark their exhibits, although they were already present on the files. The plaintiff's contention was that it was the duty of the court to allow the documents presented by the defendants to be displayed under their oaths. Which was a suggestion of plaintiffs' legal status. While recording the evidence, the documents should be obliged to appear in the evidence only because the evidence contained in the affidavits in the documents cannot be considered to be received in the evidence, the plaintiff's documents are properly exhibited. Since responsibility cannot be too heavy of responsibility, it will give the other side the opportunity to seek admissibility and tender evidence of the evidence or documents raised by the court, the court itself Was not obliged to appear, Plaintiffs' counsel, in the present case, cautious action No, the High Court did not allow the document to be presented with evidence and the plaintiffs' contention was baseless; contrary to the facts, the application for misleading and misunderstanding was dismissed in the circumstances. law firms from Mansehra lawyer