Find a Lawyer

I. PURI TERMINALS LTD. versus PORT QASIM AUTHORITY

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary Injections and Interlocutory Orders Promoted Construction of Liquid Cargo Terminal at Port Qasim on A XXXX Built, Operated and Transfer Base Project The bid submitted by the claimant was accepted, but the authority acted The importation agreement was not implemented and the plaintiff was relieved again, but it was not accepted by the plaintiff on a lawsuit filed and another contractor based on the Built, Operate and Transfer (BOT) validity liquid cargo. Prayers were requested to provide a temporary injunction to prevent the terminal from contracting, which For the sponsors to have proper financial status the plaintiff's bid was conditional and his own documents, his financial status, the plaintiff's request was not correct and he could arrange the tax with the mark and, if accepted, his Such a plan would face uncertainty. Nespak examined the plaintiff's offer in detail on the criteria laid down in the tender documents; all such factors were re-examined by the Board of Authority. The present case was not the case where the decision-making authority had been exceeded. Its power constitutes a mistake of law, violates the rules of natural justice and leads to a decision in which no reasonable person / authority could reach the plaintiff Failed to do, balance of convenience was not. In favor of the injunction because the TBI project would be put in jeopardy for a considerable period, the possibility of an increase in costs could not be ruled out, the plaintiff said. immigration advocate from Pirpai lawyer