NAWABSONS LABORATORIES (PVT.) LIMITED versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Failure to mention the Article 16 British Pharmaceutical Code, 1973 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Anti-Drug Analysis Report Test Report, applied the complete protocol of the test. The Punjab and National Institute of Health's Testing Laboratory, the Provincial Quality Control Board, declared the applicant a drug as a malicious complaint that the report did not have the applicable test protocol, therefore, it violated the AR. Was. 16 Drugs (Federal Inspectorate, Federal Drug Laboratory and Federal Government Analyst) Rules, 1976 Validation Although in the present case the report claims that the complete protocol of the test has been implemented, it has applied to arrive at this conclusion. The mechanism of is not specified. Given that the drug provided by the applicant is a non-standard report and National Institute of Certificate cannot be in accordance with health law, it cannot be made on the basis of the decision of the Provincial Quality Board as such report was without legal authority. And that too was set aside after which the High Court directed the authorities to take fresh samples according to the law. Samples will be analyzed under the R16 Drugs (Federal Inspectors, Federal Drug Laboratory and Federal Government Analyst) Rules 1976.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
