Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR JAMEEL versus THE STATE

Testimonies of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/397/34 The testimony of the eye was constant on the material points and he also stood the cross-examination, both witnesses were residents of the same area and their presence on the spot was not suspected. Was not as a witness. Immediately after filing an FIR, ocular evidence was confirmed and immediately after the FIR was filed, a wireless message was received which was received by various raiding parties who stood at the barrier and The suspects were arrested. Shortly after this incident, a separate FIR was registered in the possession of the weapons used by them during the incident that two weapons were recovered in different police stations against the two accused in this connection. ? According to the forensic science lab, the recovered cases are positively linked to the crime scene. The Shariah report was not contradictory to the medical evidence acular account because it was not possible to see with the naked eye that the dead from the rifle fired yesterday. How many shots were actually taken and then hit with a pistol as all 9 firefighters were injured. There were no admission wounds to the wounds found on the victim, as prosecutor's witnesses specifically stated that nine bullets were fired and the deceased was killed, medical evidence cannot be convincing because of ocular evidence. Can be said The death sentence and the sentence against the accused were retained under the conditions of the naked eye that really caught fire. law firms from Chaman lawyer