Find a Lawyer

CH. EHSAN SABRI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, Removal of the petition application The Judge Anti Terrorism Court held a legal position on the basis of the contract under the provisions of section 14 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 ? But during the contract concession, he was removed from his job on time due to some allegations, the governor's minister was given no opportunity to state his position merely by letter, appointing the applicant chief. Justice was made after consultation with the Lahore High Court. Because he was a competent person to take the judicial position and the applicant performed his duties for a period of one and a half years, which was dismissed on the basis of some allegations without giving him the opportunity to resign. Was. The constitutional petition also calls for the removal of the stigma of removal of his name from the job as well as claiming that under section 14 (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the judge is appointed by the Anti-Terrorism Chief Justice. The authority authorized to consult the Chief Justice at the time of his dismissal has been mandated, in the circumstances, they must be acted upon. The Federal or Provincial Government's confidence and reasons for justifying the removal of the Judge should be made known, but this was not done in the case of the applicant law, there is no doubt that the Judge has no right to dismiss The clause was there but it was a very serious step and it was necessary to maintain the dignity of the court and to safeguard the interests of the court unless the action was taken against the applicants. advocate for immigration from Mubarik Pur lawyer