Find a Lawyer

FAQIRULLAH versus KHADIM HUSSAIN

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 75, and AXXVI, R 12 Delegation of the possession of immovable property The duty of the local commissioner of judicial duty was to vacate the property of the local commissioner to the disputed property and The claimant has claimed. The dispute over the property boundary was when the defendant claimed to be the owner on the basis of a registered sale deed in the interest of his predecessor, based on his purchase from Altey. ? There was an evacuation property purchased by the plaintiff and it was officially endorsed by the Settlement Authorities, while the defendant's property was not a vacant property. The trial allowed for the limitation of this property. Was appointed local commissioner but his report was not accepted. Because the property owned by the defendants was different from that claimed by PK, the appellate court, based on the report of the local commissioner, accepted the appeal and the trial court's decision was settled that Velity Settlement. The authorities had the power to limit the property before the issuance of the Asico Property and Homelessness Act (repealed) Act 1975. Since the matter was past and closed, the plaintiff himself filed a case in the appellate court and did not examine the documents and relied on the report of the local commissioner that a local commissioner could be appointed and the site could be appointed. There was an option to visit and measure, but the court can do it. It is not up to the appellate court to decide the question property advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer