STATE versus KHAWAJA FAQIR MUHAMMAD
Pakistan Penal Code Section 406/409/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Accountability Act (IX of 1997), Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section Appeal against acquittal 44 The court was justified in preventing the discovery of the facts reached by the accountability court, which had picked up pieces of evidence supporting the prosecution case in which the defendants' suit was appropriate. The investigation was not conducted. No formal evidence was brought to the record to support the allegations. Finding a crime against the accused cannot be based solely on the high probability that the evidence can be assessed, and the evidence presented in this case had to rest assuredly and comfortably, but my chances and prospects accepted it. Could not In place of evidence, the accused had constitutional rights to their property, life and liberty and could not be harassed or dishonored in any respect. The leave to appeal without any justification was accordingly denied by the State.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Layyah lawyer