Find a Lawyer

SHEHZAD MUZAFFAR versus MASAIL KHAN ABBASI

XLI, XML, R 25 of the CCC Code of Conduct Regarding the original rules of CPC, the trial court in its appeal to the Supreme Court failed to observe that the trial court framed a case Or abandoned the option to try or determine any questions. The facts, which the appellate court deemed necessary for the correct decision to file the merit, also failed to record that the absence of the trial court to compile any issue or determine any question of fact. I could not make an effective decision. In the merits decision, the High Court, in the circumstances, remanded the trial court to the ground that it had committed illegality and laid the basis for the remand of the case, which was affirmed in O XLI, R 25, CPC or any law. The High Court did not. In the first instance he should have figured out that based on the evidence on the record, he was unable to make an effective decision and then proceed, but failed to do so to meet the vacancies and millions found by a particular party. An ND order cannot be allowed to do so, especially when this party was provided with the appropriate opportunity to present evidence but failed to do so, the High Court approved remand order in the appeal was set aside. And the case was referred to the High Court to produce its findings regarding the merits of the case based on the evidence already presented by the parties. registration advocate from Jamshoro lawyer