Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN BAHADAR KHAN versus RETURNING OFFICER, CONSTITUENCY LA-18, POONCH-2 CIVIL JUDGE, HAJIRA, AK

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly (Elections) Ordinance 1970 Sections 2, 5 (2) and 49 Legislative Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 73, 74 and 87 papers refuse to qualify for the nomination matriculation or equivalent to a recognized institution. , The candidate who has been contested must contest the election, it is necessary for the candidate to submit his papers with the certificate in this regard. The candidate failed to include the certificate with the nomination papers; the returning officer of the candidate rejected his papers saying that he was matriculated. As a Second Lieutenant at the time of his enlistment in the Army, he submitted the Matriculation Certificate to the Army Authorities, whose certificate was kept in his service record, but it was unacceptable that the candidate made further claims. That he passed the Matriculation Examination from Bombay in 1946 and that it was not possible to get a certificate from the Bombay candidate in a very short period of time. Documents to prove that he had passed the matriculation examination and applied. Was said that the documents as secondary evidence to the documents as secondary evidence in the Conan Shahadat, 1984 According to the 1984 document, if the preliminary evidence was not available, the secondary evidence must be proved by Article 74 as required. The original certificate of Conan e-Martyrs, 1984, was brought in the wrong place and the candidate did not have a certified copy of it, other documents submitted by the candidate for proof of matriculation, by this officer It was not confirmed who said that the documents or whose contents were originally assigned and were missing in the absence of such components. ask a advocate free from Hub Inds Estate lawyer