Find a Lawyer

AZAD KASHMIR LOGGING AND SAWMILLS CORPORATION versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, MUZAFFARABAD

By the limits of a district representative that appeals to the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Government Act, 1990, 64, 67 and Schedule VI of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (Sec. VIII of 4 1974) Tax on the export of commercial timber. The district council contracted in open auction to collect tax for the year 2001 to 2001, the government with another notification abolished such tax from the entire Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Which stated that such notification was void on their rights and could not be granted. Former Impact High Court accepts constitutional petition The respondent had taken possession of the respondent, when the controversial notification was issued, the respondent did not file a constitutional petition against the district council to enforce the contractual obligation, so the right to hold the constitutional petition The defendant was given a contract. In the case of litigation between the parties in the court of the year 2000 2001, which ended on a period, no period can be extended in this district in all other districts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Cannot be suspended because so can the jurisdiction. Under the law, the government cannot be considered ineffective to the extent of a citizen and can be considered ineffective for the rest of the state subjects, because discrimination has no justification for classifying respondents, if advised. So he can claim damages. The Supreme Court upheld the government's appeal for their costs in implementing the agreement. female advocates from Babri Banda lawyer