Find a Lawyer

N. B. TRADING COMPANY, SAMBERIAL (SIALKOT) versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE

Customs Act 1969 Section 17 and 123 Customs General Order No. 15/1989, Dated 21 10 1989 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 Constitution Petition imported by Indian Customs Customs personnel to transport such goods at Karachi port. After detaining and searching various goods, violations of the law took action under the Customs Act, 1969. Applicants believed that the customs officers at Karachi Port had no jurisdiction to inspect such goods, but they only provided such information to the customs officers concerned in the relevant port of customs in Karachi. Can do. The legally unstable High Court allowed constitutional requests to declare such proceedings without legal authority and instructed the respondents to detain and investigate all the containers they had opened. And transfer it to the dry port of your destination, and pass through. The result of the information, inquiry / inquiry, and all its contents is available to the customs authorities at their respective dry ports, which act as guaranteed by law. immigration advocates phone number from Dandot lawyer