Find a Lawyer

KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION THROUGH DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION versus REHMAT MASIH THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND 4 OTHERS

Auto-amending scope of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, exempting Article 15 (2) and 17 of the Industrial Payments Act 1936 (XXIII of 1969), Article 38 (3A) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution. Appeal against the authority, a job that was to retire in 1982 after getting 60 years of imprisonment, he continued to work until 1984 due to manipulation of service records related to his date of birth and continued to draw salaries. Kept, the employee deducted the excess amount on detection of the manipulation, leaving the employees payable for a period of two years, payment wages On a concrete request under section 15 (2) of the Act, 1936, under payment of payment, the Authority legalized the said deduction and authorized the employee to pay the wages without deduction. The Labor Court set aside the filing of a revision against the order when the employer filed an appeal against such order regarding the first compensation for the illegal deduction. Approved by the Labor Court, the Labor Appellate Tribunal allowed the employee's request and set aside the order approved by the Labor Court and restored the order approved by the Authority's Validity manipulation, if the employee's date of birth If a reference to a service record was made, the employer's office as a service record was in the custody of the employer and was not in the custody of the employee, if the employee is allowed to work for two years, Manipulation was the responsibility of employers and employees alike, who lived longer and, for two years, worked Was eligible for wages during the period eligible for the tree, inheritance advocates near Naudero lawyer