Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHMED BAIG versus THE STATE

Sections 28 and 29 of the Criminal Procedure Code (as amended by the Legal Reforms Act (XXIII of 1997)] and Section 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 174, 175 and 228 Judicial Applicants Applicable to the jurisdiction of the petitioner / accused, who was the investigating officer in the criminal case pending trial before the special judge, was bound for the case property along with the presence of witnesses and witnesses before the court, but The applicant failed to comply with the court order on the relevant date for no reason. The trial court issued a show cause notice to the applicant, but did not respond to the notice. The trial court directed the petitioner to file a complaint against the applicant for the offense under Sections 174, 175 and 228. The complaint was referred to the Judicial Court before the court of competent jurisdiction filed under Sections 28 and 29 of the PC Magistrate, who, having knowledge of the case, was registered under Sections 1, 175 and 228 of the PCC. May try, PPC confession / Judicial Magistrate case against the applicant has occurred in the relevant district boundaries, the District Magistrate has been charged They will have jurisdiction to prosecute, not magistrates from other district courts. In both cases, the Judicial Magistrate was not authorized to review the matter which was dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate on the basis of misconduct of judicial proceedings. immigration advocates contact from Kotla lawyer