MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus UROOJ (PRIVATE) LTD.
O xxxx, Rr 1 and 2 on the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 182 and 188 on the temporary injunction suit exclusively through the sale agreement against the agent and his principal. The power of attorney who is executed will then provide a memorandum of understanding in favor of his agent so that the lawyer will agree in advance about the sale of the shops at a cost of at least Rs 9 lakh each. Contracted with and paid the agent to purchase 47 shops considering 42 shops. The payment of Rs 25,000,000 as principal was rejected by the Principal for exceeding the option given to his agent and contrary to the limitations imposed on him, the Principal temporarily approved the sale of the Balance Instead of submitting to the matter, the respondent agreed to provide security of up to Rs. 3,60,000 to each shop provided that the principal should be directed to deposit part P in general. The receipt by the Principal Validity Plaintiff was denied, despite the admission by the court, in such cases the first case for the Preventive Court I was going to fail, usually it will order to collect the balance of the sale price to see. In fact, the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract of sale in which specific performance was demanded. Such acquisition was not paid directly to the principal by the plaintiff. The balance of the case was not in favor of the plaintiff and the principal would be put in the matter. Disadvantages, if they exercise the right and power in relation to their property
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer