HAMEED AKBAR KHAN versus ELECTION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Arts 63 (1) (o) and 199 Representatives Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), section 14 Constitutional application Utilizing non-payment of utility costs, danger in paying water bills ? The election tribunal rejected the candidate's nomination on the basis that it had defaulted on the payment of water charges. The candidate's play is part of a property in which the water charges were unpaid, so he made the allegations. Cannot be imprisoned with liability. And, in any case, they found out about the pending charges when they checked their papers, and they immediately cleared them of receiving the same accuracy information, the candidate owning part of the property. For which water charges were called free of charge. Under Article 63 (1) (o) of the Constitution, the compensation remains after the filing of nominations while the default reservation papers are submitted, therefore, the payment of public liabilities and utility expenses after the filing of the papers nomination. In the present case under Article 63 (1) (o), the candidate has approved the nomination. The papers were water payable since 1985, and if the candidate was unaware of this, the responsibility fell on him, who was part owner of the property in the contract and must be very careful in approving utility costs. Accordingly, the constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
