Section 19 Laws on Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17 (2) (Transfer of another 79 of the Property Law (IV of 1882), Section 554 Civil Procedure (V of 1908)), II, R2 Specific Relief Act (I) in 1877), shall sell in the form of an affidavit written on stamp paper of Rs 4 for the specific performance of the Section 12 Government Land For Sale Agreement, under the Thala Development Authority suit, for the issuance of such stamp paper. The purpose was not mentioned at the back. Knowing the person to whom he issued such stamp paper was legally obliged to present two witnesses to prove such an affidavit / agreement, one of such affidavit / agreement. The witness, who wrote a line on his back, was suspended that he knows the defendant, signed in his presence, but did not dismiss anything in relation to the affidavit / contract execution. , The death of another witness of such affidavit / agreement has been reported, but he did not sign such affidavit / agreement as confirmation. In the absence of confirmation by two minor witnesses, a valid document could not be declared in the case of Arts 17 (2) (a) and 79 of the Martyrdom, the 1984 plaintiff failed to explain why such a document was written. Gone? In the form of an affidavit rather than an appropriate agreement, such affidavit / agreement did not show the amount to be considered for sale and how much was paid at the time of its execution and how much was to be paid later. However, if an affidavit is absent, it could not be read as a sale contract and no legal consequence as it was such an important ingredient and unregistered.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
