Eliminating a candidate from contesting elections on the basis of Articles 62 (1) (F) of Arts 62 (1) (F) and 199 Representative People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Article 14 (Request for Membership of Parliament) The Returning Officer and the Election Tribunal rejected the nomination papers on the basis that the Supreme Court and the Islamabad High Court in its alleged corruption cases questioned the rejection of the nomination papers. Made negative announcements / observations against. Rental power plants, etc., as reported in accordance with SCMR 773 of 2012 and MN Construction Company (WP No. 3387/2012 dated 28 3 2012), the court of accuracy in the case of alleged corruption in rental power plants Excellency, after considering the facts of this case. Wisdom did not record or direct any inquiries into disqualifying candidates or others, nor has the matter been forwarded to the National Accountability Bureau for further investigation. Therefore, in the case of MN Construction Company no declaration was made under Article 62 (1) (f) of the Constitution Islamabad High Court (WP No. 3387/2012 dated 28 3 2012) sent a copy of the decision to the Chief Election. ? Along with the Commissioner, the Returning Officer of the candidate's constituency instructed him to appreciate the observations made in the decision and make an independent decision whether the candidate was honest, good, honest, straightforward, honest and not reliable. Can be understood The final declaration of the nature required to attract the provisions of Article 62 (1) (f) of the Constitution was issued by the Islamabad High Court, and the language observation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
