According to the FIR, the complainant allegedly handed over the gold worth Rs 68,80,000 to the accused but the complainant, according to the FIR, was found guilty of dishonesty under Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860) The registration of the plaintiff's lawsuit, filed in connection with the same matter, revealed that the complainant had taken a different stand, saying that the accused had obtained the same amount of loan from the complainant, of any witness in the FIR. It was not mentioned that in the presence of which the gold was handed over as an accused in the case, two more FIs were also lodged against the accused. , But the accused succeeded in obtaining bail, which did not fall under the prohibited clause of section 7497 of the accused, CRPC complained that the accused issued 43 checks for settlement of the gold quantity. , And the defendants filed a civil lawsuit in connection with the pending checks, which were pending adjudication, and their decision was to be made whether they issued checks to the civil court as gold payments or were considered without consideration. Concern was issued that the accused's bail application was granted and he was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
