MAUJ DIN versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION
Article XXVI of Supreme Court Rules Reviewing AXXVI Supreme Court Decision Clerk's Error Accounts Misrepresentation of Petition Number Wanted to Reopen Matter on Product Index Unit Related to Disputed Area Such re-hearing was not permissible error. In the notice of record, while hearing the present petition, the notice states that in the judgment under the KATA review number, where cancellation of the respondents' land was made. What was to go was recorded when the correct number was 19, therefore, false No. 19 shall be read in the judgment instead of 17 and shall be subject to such amendment; accordingly the petition has been excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Diamer lawyer
