PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus AZHAR ABBAS
Ad hoc appointments in various departments of the Provincial Government, Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Sections 2 (1) (A), 5 (1) and 10 (1), (2) and (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3). At the expiration of the initial period, such appointments were continued for a period of six months and their ad hoc appointments were periodically removed from their service by various orders issued by their respective departments Service Tribunals. Expanded to That the employees were entitled to hold and continue their positions, as long as they were present on the order of termination of employment, regularly elected committees were made available by prescribed method and by the relevant departments in law. Accordingly the provincial government maintained a legitimate dispute The Service Tribunal failed to recognize that the Chief Minister of the province had made the appointment for political purposes and that the departments were to comply with the Chief's order. Had Because of unnecessary political pressure, the Minister, although the Chief Minister had passed the order without looking at the legitimate procedure. The service tribunal also failed to recognize that the government had no legal obligation to extend the service term of an ad hoc appointee, which would not have been extended by the government under the relevant rules. So he was responsible for eliminating it. That the Government is in favor of terminating the services of such public servants under section 10 (3) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 and the withdrawal of regular election committees for the removal of ad hoc employees under section 10 (there was no condition) 3) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 10 (1) and (2) of the Act which constitute an independent jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Turbat lawyer