MAQSOOD AHMAD versus A.D.C. (C) A.S.C. (L), GUJRANWALA
Under Constitution Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 (3) Article 199 of the Constitution, the way to sue a constitutional petition before the High Court was to cancel the allotment of property under this question in the name of the persons from whom the applicants purchased the property. The allotment of the respondents was restored. Applicants of the High Court, under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, refused the order of reinstatement. The property was purchased to effect a fair and illegal action on the constitutional petition Was not prosecuted. Excellent manner and defendants were unnecessarily dragged into litigation whose allotment was restored. Respondents did not have any legal effect in favor of the previous owners, with the restoration of the allotment, therefore, to the previous owners. There was no legal effect for the applicants from any sale of the property. Rt observed that the applicants can take action against the previous owners to recover the amount of consideration and the order to appeal the leave of the High Court. Was refused to interfere
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Topi lawyer